O’Reilly: Karzai’s Concern For Civilian Causalities Is ‘Insulting’

123 Responses to “O’Reilly: Karzai’s Concern For Civilian Causalities Is ‘Insulting’”

Oh, I think Karzai DOES understand that in war, collateral damage is constantly present — he actually deals with it every day. But he also understands something O’Reilly doesn’t — that you can’t have constant collateral damage and no real damage to the intended objective and still harbor any hope of “winning the hearts and minds” of the local population.
January 27th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

Chuck Feney Says:
By O’Reilly’s standard, would he argue that the civilians dead on 9/11 were also collateral damage for US policy, and their survivors are ungrateful for the mighty American military standing on the neck of the oppressed.January 27th, 2009 at 2:06 pm

Karzai is insulting by worrying about civilian deaths - kind opf like the US worrying about citizen deaths on 9/11.
O’Reilly: Karzai’s Concern For Civilian Causalities Is ‘Insulting’