U.S. Dilemma of Cost Benefit Analysis of Afghanistan War - Professor Kamrany

In response to the September 11th attacks that resulted in 2,752 American deaths , then President Bush declared in a Presidential Address to the Nation in October of 2001 that he had ordered the U.S. military to begin strikes in Afghanistan. The purpose of these strikes, according to President Bush, was to degrade the military capabilities of the Taliban and prevent Afghanistan from being used as a base for terrorism ; although the perpetrator of 9/11 Osama Bin Laden and his Arab cronies had crossed the Afghanistan border in December of 2001 through Tora Bora into Pakistan where they were granted hideout for approximately 10 years. The U.S. war in Afghanistan should have ended at that time. Instead it became embroiled in domestic tribal discord and U.S. security concerns 

Since 2001-14, more than 2,000 Americans soldiers have died and Afghanistan civilian causality is estimated to be around 26,000 (underestimated by some accounts), nearly 13 times greater. Moreover, the U.S. has invested upward $680 billion in the Afghanistan war effort known as Operation Enduring Freedom , yet the abuse and efficacy of those funds is startling. Despite such sacrifice and tremendous spending, the Afghanistan government continues to be unstable and the Taliban is still far from submissive. After 14 years of engagement in Afghanistan, U.S. intelligence agencies have contended that further U.S. military involvement and spending will not be a productive use of our resources and will further harm our ability to contain domestic discourse and tribal hostility.

To be clear, this paper does not detract from the incredible sacrifice made by U.S. troops, on the contrary, we honor it by exposing the incredible losses suffered and critiquing a war policy that will put more American soldiers and Afghan civilians in danger. As reported by the Department of Defence, 2,215 American soldiers have been killed and 20,027 wounded in action in Operation Enduring Freedom . Those who returned home have faced long waits, inadequate treatment, and a bureaucracy, as evinced by the Veteran Affairs debacle of 2013, which has not shown veterans the respect that they deserve. On the Afghanistan front, the United Nations estimated that there was 14,064 civilian deaths and 23,107 injuries from 2009-2013. Neta Crawford of Boston University approximates that in total 26,270 Afghanistan civilians have died since the 2001 invasion . This bloodshed demands an honest evaluation of American policy and should not be used as an excuse to continue the engagement in Afghanistan on the pretext of "finishing the fight" when we have not clearly set out what we are fighting for.

The colossal expenditure, astounding waste, and enormous damages sustained by both parties, that the U.S. has committed to the Afghanistan war is immoral. According to the Congressional Records Services, Congress has allocated a whopping $686 billion to Operation Enduring Freedom. More than $104 billion has been allocated for Afghanistan reconstruction from 2002-2014 , an amount that is larger than the entire Marshal Plan, even when adjusted for inflation. Yet, there is absence of substantial, successful reconstruction. The waste and egregious lack of accountability astounds: the United States Special Inspector General of Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) who revealed in April that an audit of the Army legacy east project found that $134 million in unsupported costs ; a $12 million slaughterhouse project for the Afghan army was later scrapped because it was found that an existing facility would suffice ; $488 million has been invested in Afghanistan oil, gas, and mineral industry projects that have been riddled, according to SIGAR, with a lack of US coordination, strategy and sustainable planning. - Read More at Huffingtonpost

U.S. Dilemma of Cost Benefit Analysis of Afghanistan War